Reading time saved: 30 minutes
29 replies, 966 views, 69 likes
The Ethereum Name Service (ENS) community is debating the establishment of Service Provider Streams to support providers, focusing on eligibility, funding, and selection processes, with transparency and community involvement being crucial. The community must finalize these processes and choose the best technical streaming solution amidst concerns over implementation speed and potential risks.
The discussion is centered on the implementation of ENS Service Provider Streams, designed to support service providers within the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) ecosystem. The conversation includes the drafting of rules and processes, which encompass eligibility criteria, funding rules, voting procedures, and the selection process for service providers. The Meta-Governance Working Group is tasked with managing the application process, funding distribution, and rule compliance. There is an ongoing debate about the optimal technical solution for managing these streams, with Superfluid, Sablier, and Hedgey being potential candidates.
The community is actively participating in the discussion, offering various viewpoints on the proposed rules and technical implementations. Transparency is a key concern, with service providers expected to disclose potential conflicts of interest and provide regular updates. Some members are worried about the timing of the proposal and suggest allowing more time for a comprehensive voting process. The debate also extends to the appropriate funding increments for service providers, with figures between $100,000 and $200,000 being proposed. Technical discussions are ongoing regarding the most suitable streaming solutions, with different providers promoting their services. Lcfr.eth raised a question about whether there are rules preventing well-funded companies from seeking funds from the community29, to which AvsA responded by explaining that the funds are not handouts but payments for future services to ENS DAO, subject to the DAO's continued approval30.
The community needs to finalize the rules and processes for the ENS Service Provider Streams, decide on the most suitable streaming solution, and plan the service provider selection process. Ongoing discussions are necessary to address concerns and achieve consensus on the best way forward.
Posted 19 days ago
Last reply 3 days ago
Summary updated 3 days ago
Last updated 04/12 00:20