x23.ai

alpha

Withdrawal Periods for L3s using Arbitrum Orbit

3 replies, 590 views, 6 likes

research.arbitrum.io

TL;DR:

The community is actively discussing the complexities of the withdrawal periods for Arbitrum Orbit based Layer 3s, with a focus on the role of bisection steps and sequencer censorship. While the engagement fosters understanding and potential for improvements, the extended withdrawal period and lack of information about the "superchain" could deter users and cause uncertainty.

What is this about?

The discussion revolves around the withdrawal periods for Arbitrum Orbit based Layer 3s. The community is exploring whether it would take 14 days to exit funds to Ethereum. The conversation also delves into the complexities of the withdrawal process, including the role of bisection steps and sequencer censorship. The concept of a "superchain" built using OP Stack is also brought up, although detailed information about it is not provided.

How is the community reacting?

The community is actively engaged in the discussion, with users like Ana, Edfelten, and Shotaro contributing valuable insights. Ana initiated the conversation, questioning the withdrawal period for Arbitrum Orbit based Layer 3s. Edfelten confirmed that it would indeed take 14 days from Layer 3 to Layer 1 with default parameters, unless a fast bridging service is used. However, Shotaro clarified that the withdrawal process is more complex, with each bisection step subject to sequencer censorship of 24 hours. This would extend the withdrawal period to approximately 24 days.

Why this is positive?

The discussion is fostering a deeper understanding of the withdrawal periods for Arbitrum Orbit based Layer 3s. It's encouraging to see community members like Shotaro providing detailed explanations about the withdrawal process, including the role of bisection steps and sequencer censorship. This kind of engagement helps to clarify complex topics and promotes a more informed community. Furthermore, the mention of the open-source nature of the "superchain" suggests potential for community contributions and improvements.

Why this is negative?

The complexity of the withdrawal process, particularly the extended withdrawal period of approximately 24 days, could be seen as a negative aspect. This could potentially deter users from using Layer 3s, impacting the adoption and usability of such systems. Additionally, the lack of information about the "superchain" built using OP Stack could lead to confusion and uncertainty within the community.

Posted 4 months ago

Last reply 3 months ago

Summary updated 23 days ago

Last updated 04/12 00:19