What is this about?

This discussion revolves around a collaborative proposal by Lamoka and MetricsDAO for managing, evaluating, and supervising the Arbitrum Short-Term Incentives Program (STIP) 21¹. The proposed framework focuses on data monitoring and reporting, with granular oversight on fund management, holistic assessment of grant efficacy, in-depth analytics with real-time reporting, immersive community engagement, and ensuring long-term strategic impact¹. The system will track and scrutinize grant funds, implementing an alert mechanism for any irregularities in fund usage¹. It aims to quantify the efficacy of each ARB spent, providing a detailed view into the impact and ROI generated per grant, per pool, and per asset basis¹.

Aaron_L outlined a comprehensive plan for evaluating the effectiveness and impact of Arbitrum grants on the ecosystem's health and growth¹. The plan includes a Liquidity Flow Analysis, Sector Analysis, and an extended Claimant Analysis¹. The project timeline spans from October 30, 2023, to January 31, 2024, and includes phases for kickoff and initial setup, data collection and reporting, and analysis and refinement¹.

How is the community reacting?

The community is actively engaged in the discussion, with Aaron_L providing a detailed timeline for a project involving the Arbitrum community, with activities spanning from January to April 2024¹. The project includes presentation of end-of-year summaries, refinement of metrics, generation of bi-weekly reports, deep dive analysis, advanced data monitoring, and final data collection and report drafting¹.

Why this is positive?

The proposed framework and project plan are positive as they aim to bring transparency, accountability, and efficiency to the Arbitrum STIP¹. The detailed analytics and reporting infrastructure will provide real-time insights, live dashboards, and periodic detailed reports, offering a comprehensive view of the program's impact¹. The project also emphasizes community engagement and transparent communication, planning for bi-weekly updates on project progress, fund utilizations, detected anomalies, and overall program impact¹.

Why this is negative?

There are no negative aspects highlighted in the discussion. The community seems to be in agreement with the proposed framework and project plan, appreciating the focus on transparency, accountability, and efficiency¹.