What is this about?

The L2BEAT governance team, which includes Krst and Sinkas, has initiated a community discussion on two key topics. The first topic is centered around community growth, with a specific focus on educational content and events. This discussion will be based on three proposals put forward by Brichis, Sebix, and PatrickAlphaC. The second topic of discussion is protocol owned liquidity (POL), a subject that has been a point of contention between Sushi and ApeSwap. The team has encouraged all delegates and community members to familiarize themselves with the relevant proposals and to prepare any questions they may have in advance.

How is the community reacting?

The community's reaction to these discussions is not explicitly mentioned in the summaries. However, the fact that the governance team is encouraging members to familiarize themselves with the proposals and prepare questions suggests that they are expecting active participation and engagement from the community.

Why this is positive?

The initiation of these discussions is a positive step as it shows that the L2BEAT governance team is actively seeking to engage with the community and is open to their input. The focus on educational content and events could potentially lead to increased community growth and engagement. The discussion on protocol owned liquidity (POL) shows that the team is willing to address contentious issues head-on, which could lead to more robust and resilient protocols.

Why this is negative?

There are no explicit negative aspects mentioned in the summaries. However, it could be inferred that the ongoing debate between Sushi and ApeSwap over protocol owned liquidity (POL) might be causing some tension or uncertainty within the community. This could potentially have negative implications if not addressed effectively.