0 replies, 143 views, 1 likes
Penia's proposal "Temporarily Block PlutusDAO From ARB Grants/Airdrops" to the DAO was immediately hidden by a moderator, preventing any discussion or feedback. This has sparked concerns about transparency in the moderation process, while Penia's efforts to understand the reasons and seek feedback demonstrate a positive willingness to learn and adapt.
This discussion revolves around a proposal made by Penia to the DAO, titled "Temporarily Block PlutusDAO From ARB Grants/Airdrops". However, the proposal was immediately hidden by a moderator, which prevented any visibility or comments on it. Despite Penia's attempts to seek clarification on Discord, they received no response and are now seeking assistance on the forum to understand what needs to be changed in the proposal to prevent it from being hidden in the future.
The community's reaction is not clear from the information provided. However, it can be inferred that Penia's proposal has not been able to generate any discussion or feedback due to it being hidden by a moderator. This has led to Penia seeking help on the forum to understand the reasons behind the action and how to prevent it in the future.
The positive aspect of this situation is that Penia is actively seeking feedback and trying to understand the reasons behind the moderator's actions. This shows a willingness to learn and adapt, which is a positive trait in any community member. It also opens up a potential discussion on the transparency and guidelines of the moderation process.
On the negative side, the immediate hiding of Penia's proposal without any explanation can be seen as a lack of transparency in the moderation process. This could potentially discourage members from making proposals or participating in discussions, fearing their contributions might also be hidden without any clear reasons.
Posted 3 months ago
Last reply 3 months ago
Summary updated a month ago
Last updated 09/12 13:53