Reading time saved: 3 minutes
2 replies, 383 views, 13 likes
The L2BEAT governance team, including Krst and Sinkas, shared their voting rationale and criteria for Security Council nominees, which was appreciated by the community for its transparency. The nominees, including Philipp Jovanovic and Haroon.eth, were selected based on technical knowledge, reputation, independence from OffChain Labs or Arbitrum Foundation, and location.
This discussion revolves around the voting process for the Security Council nominees by the governance team of L2BEAT, which includes Krst and Sinkas. They have shared their voting rationale and the criteria they used to select the nominees. The criteria included strong technical knowledge, reputation at stake, no connection to OffChain Labs or Arbitrum Foundation, and location. The nominees they voted for were Philipp Jovanovic, Haroon.eth, Emiliano Bonassi, Caleb Lau, and Paul Imseih. In the second round, they maintained the same criteria and spread their voting power across 6 nominees, reiterating their support for Philipp Jovanovic and Haroon.eth.
The community has shown appreciation for the transparency and detail in the voting rationale provided by L2BEAT's governance team. Haaroon, in particular, expressed appreciation for the detailed explanation of the voting rationale. The discussion also highlighted the technical expertise and contributions of four individuals in the field of web security, including Emiliano Bonassi, Omer Goldberg, Weibo Wang (Nolan), and Ali Atlia.
The transparency and detail in the voting rationale provided by L2BEAT's governance team is a positive aspect of this discussion. It allows the community to understand the decision-making process and the criteria used to select the nominees. This transparency fosters trust and engagement within the community. The discussion also highlights the technical expertise and contributions of the nominees, which is a testament to the high caliber of individuals involved in the process.
There doesn't seem to be any negative aspects in this discussion. The community has shown appreciation for the transparency and detail in the voting rationale, and the nominees have been recognized for their technical expertise and contributions. However, it's important to note that the selection process is based on specific criteria, which may not cover all aspects of a nominee's qualifications or potential contributions.
Posted 2 months ago
Last reply 2 months ago
Summary updated 25 days ago
Last updated 04/12 00:19