Security Council Elections 101

Reading time saved: 4 minutes

1 replies, 452 views, 17 likes



The Arbitrum DAO's Security Council Elections, scheduled for September 15, 2023, is a tri-phase process aimed at electing members to handle critical emergencies. While the process encourages community participation and ensures fair vote distribution, its complexity and stringent contender requirements may limit participation and candidate pool.

What is this about?

This discussion revolves around the Arbitrum DAO's Security Council Elections, a process that takes place every six months to elect new members or re-elect existing ones to the Security Council. The Security Council is responsible for responding to critical emergencies, such as the need for fast upgrades to fix critical bugs in the system. The first Arbitrum DAO Security Council Election is scheduled for September 15, 2023. The election process is divided into three phases: Nominee Selection, Compliance Check, and Member Selection.

How is the community reacting?

The community is actively encouraged to participate in the election process. Potential contenders can put themselves up for vote and campaign for themselves on the governance forum. Delegates are encouraged to vote and to carefully consider the decreasing weight mechanism when planning their voting strategy. All members of the Arbitrum community, regardless of whether they have delegate votes, are encouraged to participate in the elections and weigh in on who they think would be strong candidates for Security Council membership.

Why this is positive?

The election process ensures that the Security Council is composed of members who align with the DAO's values and interests. It also provides a platform for community members to actively participate in the governance of the Arbitrum ecosystem. The decreasing weight voting mechanism ensures that votes are distributed fairly among the candidates. The 13-day grace period after the election allows users to withdraw their funds if they wish, ensuring that the election results can propagate to the Security Council contracts across all relevant chains.

Why this is negative?

The complexity of the election process, particularly the decreasing weight voting mechanism, may be challenging for some community members to understand and navigate. This could potentially lead to a lower participation rate in the elections. Furthermore, the requirement for contenders to meet legal requirements, service agreements, and additional rules dictated by the Constitution may limit the pool of potential candidates.

Posted 3 months ago

Last reply 3 months ago

Summary updated 24 days ago

Last updated 03/12 08:01