What is this about?

This discussion revolves around the proposed modifications to the governance infrastructure of ArbitrumDAO by Cattin¹. The proposal includes three Request for Comments (RFC) Proposals: ArbitrumDAO Governance Cycle (RFC-1), Delegate Incentive System for ArbitrumDAO (RFC-2), and Introduction of a new role in governance - Governance Facilitator (RFC-3)¹. The aim is to establish a solid foundation for the DAO to scale and secure Arbitrum's success.

How is the community reacting?

The community has shown a positive response to the proposals. DisruptionJoe, in particular, has expressed interest in helping to move the proposals forward². He agreed with the first proposal, RFC-1, but suggested establishing it as a norm after getting proper feedback instead of ratifying it into "law"². For the second proposal, RFC-2, he referenced a post from Frisson that he believed encapsulated the idea well². For the third proposal, RFC-3, he suggested Shawn16400 for the role of Governance Facilitator, citing his previous experience with Gitcoin².

Why this is positive?

The proposals are seen as a positive step towards improving the governance of ArbitrumDAO. They aim to define clear working times, implement a clear incentive system for delegates, and introduce a new role to ensure operational efficiency and transparency¹. The community's positive response and willingness to contribute to the proposals' development further highlight their potential benefits.

Why this is negative?

While the proposals are generally well-received, there are concerns about ratifying the first proposal, RFC-1, into "law". DisruptionJoe suggested that it should be established as a norm after getting proper feedback². This indicates that while the community is open to changes, they also value flexibility and adaptability in the governance process.