Reading time saved: 5 minutes
5 replies, 892 views, 29 likes
The discussion led by DisruptionJoe focused on the importance of legitimacy in decision-making processes within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), particularly in relation to their grants frameworks. The conversation highlighted the need for a clear framework to enhance effectiveness, the importance of group sense-making in creating legitimacy, and the challenges in establishing a grants framework that considers various factors such as mission alignment, voting & power distribution, and reputation & trust.
This discussion, led by DisruptionJoe, revolves around the concept of legitimacy in decision-making processes, particularly in the context of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and their grants frameworks1. The conversation was inspired by a Grants Framework Workshop at MetaCamp, where participants identified common problems and successful outcomes they've seen in DAOs' grants frameworks1. The group also discussed the variable components of a grants round, including different allocation methods, grant eligibility, and regulation1. The discussion concluded with the understanding that there is no universal funding model for a DAO, and that a clear framework can enhance the effectiveness of programs and rounds1.
The community has reacted positively to the discussion. Users such as Jengajojo, Blueweb, Jon_Beat, and Invitedtea expressed their appreciation for the insightful post2,3,4,5. Invitedtea specifically highlighted the discussion on decision variables and funding models, including allocation methods, grant eligibility, regulation, and considerations like representation of minority voices and capital efficiency5. Shawn16400 noted the lack of consolidated reading around DAO and web3 grant programs, despite the significant amount of funding distributed in this area. He appreciated DisruptionJoe's leadership in developing thinking in this niche of DAO governance and requested for more content related to grant programs6.
The discussion is positive as it brings to light the importance of legitimacy in decision-making processes within DAOs. It also provides a platform for participants to share their experiences and insights, leading to a collective understanding of the patterns that play out in DAOs1. The discussion also emphasizes the need for more testing to validate the effects of different experimentation levers, the importance of group sense-making in creating legitimacy, and the necessity for a DAO native process for aligning mission, vision, and values1.
While the discussion is largely positive, it does highlight some challenges within DAOs, such as issues with mission alignment, voting & power distribution, and reputation & trust1. It also underscores the complexity of establishing a grants framework that considers various factors such as vision & mission, priorities, values, principles and boundaries, total spending limits, outcome & impact evaluation standards, and composability requirements for software1.
Posted 5 months ago
Last reply 4 months ago
Summary updated a month ago
Last updated 09/12 13:53