The discussion primarily focused on a proposal by TokenLogic for a 6-month service provider agreement with Aave DAO. The proposal aimed to formalize TokenLogic's contributions to the Aave ecosystem and secure funding for the team to deliver the outlined scope in the TEMP CHECK. The proposal detailed a plan to swap 350,000 aethDAI from the Treasury to GHO via the Aave Swap contract, creating a 180-day stream for 350,000 units of GHO¹.

Community members, including ApuMallku and 0xkeyrock.eth, requested a budget breakdown and clarity on differing views and strategies proposed by Dydymoon and TokenLogic^2,3. Dydymoon clarified their independent contributor status to Aave DAO and their decision to stop contributing to TokenLogic to prevent further confusion⁴. In response to the feedback, TokenLogic announced plans to hire a DeFi Strategist and develop a frontend for the Safety Module (SM) and GHO bribe model⁷.

Concerns were raised by Kene_StableLab about the size of the compensation for the TokenLogic team, questioning the justification for $700k/year for four contributors⁹. Jengajojo suggested breaking down the funding request between a fixed amount and performance-based compensation to provide clarity and align incentives¹⁰. TokenLogic responded by announcing their plans to use funding to expand their team, which currently includes R3genFinance and a part-time designer. They are looking to hire a developer and strategist⁷.

The discussion evolved with the community seeking clarity and transparency in the proposal and its execution. The outcome of the proposal and its acceptance within the community were yet to be determined. ApuMallku asked TokenLogic about the status of a certain proposal. The specifics of the proposal were not mentioned¹². However, TokenLogic announced that they have decided to cancel the proposal based on discussions with various stakeholders within the Aave community. They plan to prepare a revised service provider ARFC proposal in the coming week¹³.