LBS Blockchain Society Delegate Platform

Reading time saved: 217 minutes

573 replies, 10470 views, 149 likes


The Aave community, with significant input from Lbsblockchain, is actively voting on proposals to enhance platform performance and risk management, including onboarding new assets, updating frameworks, and deprecating the v2 market. These decisions, largely supported by the community, aim to unify Aave's strategic direction, improve stability and security, but also carry risks of new vulnerabilities and highlight the need for better communication and technical governance improvements.

What is this about?

The discussion revolves around the strategic decisions and development within the Aave ecosystem, focusing on proposals that aim to improve platform performance and risk management. The community has been actively participating in voting on various proposals, which address the onboarding of new assets, adjusting parameters, and deprecating underperforming assets. Lbsblockchain has been a significant contributor to these decisions, casting votes and providing rationales for their choices, which have influenced the platform's trajectory. Their recent votes include support for rewarding white hats, updating risk frameworks, onboarding new assets, and deprecating the v2 market. Additionally, Lbsblockchain has voted on a series of technical updates, onboarding assets to Aave V3, and renewing partnerships with risk service providers.

How is the community reacting?

The community has shown strong support for the proposed changes, with most initiatives receiving approval, indicating a consensus on the direction of the Aave ecosystem. Lbsblockchain has been a key player in the outcomes, influencing the platform's evolution through their votes and insights. They have been involved in various decisions, such as updating the Asset Onboarding Framework, onboarding osETH to Aave v3, and responding to operational changes like freezing price feeds on v3 Harmony. Their involvement extends to supporting the Aave Funding Updates proposal, renewing Gauntlet as a risk service provider, and voting on a range of other technical and strategic updates.

Why this is positive?

  • The community's consensus on proposals suggests a unified vision for Aave's future.
  • Risk mitigation strategies are expected to enhance platform stability.
  • The introduction of new assets and the removal of underperforming ones could improve platform health and security.
  • Lbsblockchain's proactive approach to platform management is evident in their support for various proposals, including increasing the GHO borrow rate and onboarding Native USDC to Aave V3 Optimism.
  • The approval of the V2 Deprecation Plan and amendments to Safety Module AAVE Emissions aligns with the community's strategic vision.
  • Lbsblockchain's support for streamlining the asset listing process and improving governance within the DAO is a positive step forward.
  • The decision to freeze price feeds on v3 Harmony and allow the Emergency Admin to freeze on Aave V2 shows adaptability to external changes.
  • The clarity provided by the runway frontend and alignment with the original proposal in the Aave Funding Updates is a positive development.
  • Rewarding white hats for reporting vulnerabilities, as supported by Lbsblockchain's YES vote on the GHO_Incident_Report, enhances the security of the Aave protocol.
  • Aligning with Chaos Labs' recommendation for a moderate increase in borrow rates and deprecating the v2 market is a strategic move to ensure the platform's sustainability.
  • Lbsblockchain's recent votes on deploying AURA, updating the PriceOracleSentinel, onboarding wstETH, and activating Aave Governance V3, among others, demonstrate their commitment to the platform's growth and security.

Why this is negative?

  • Platform changes carry the risk of introducing new vulnerabilities.
  • Abstention from voting on certain proposals indicates a need for better communication within the community.
  • Lbsblockchain's NO vote on upgrading the Safety Module with StkGHO reflects concerns about the potential negative impact on stability due to the asset's immaturity.
  • The decision to vote NO on adding EURC to Avalanche Aave V3 due to operational concerns and low traction suggests challenges in asset expansion.

Next actions

The community should continue to monitor the effects of the implemented proposals and remain engaged in upcoming votes. Active participation in governance is essential for maintaining the platform's alignment with the collective vision. Technical improvements to facilitate smoother governance participation are also necessary. Ongoing technical enhancements are needed to address front-end issues highlighted by Lbsblockchain's experience. No next action has been determined.

Posted a year ago

Last reply 12 hours ago

Summary updated 12 hours ago

Last updated 06/12 00:43